Available Issues
Authors:
| Md. Hafizur Rahman | Researcher, HafizLab, Bangladesh |
| M. Naderuzzaman | Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sonargaon University, Dhaka, Bangladesh |
Index Terms:
M2M, IoT, HTTP, WebSocket, XMPP, AMQP, MQTT, CoAP, DDS, LPWAN, LwM2MAbstract:
The rapid expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT) and smart device ecosystems has accelerated the development and deployment of Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communication protocols. M2M communication enables autonomous data exchange between devices without human intervention, forming the backbone of modern IoT applications in industries such as healthcare, transportation, energy, and manufacturing. This comprehensive review provides an in-depth analysis of the most widely adopted M2M communication protocols, including HTTP, WebSocket, XMPP, AMQP, MQTT, CoAP, DDS, LPWAN and LwM2M. The paper explores their architectural principles, operational mechanisms, and core features, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations in various application scenarios. Comparative analysis is presented based on critical performance metrics such as scalability, latency, security, energy efficiency, interoperability, and Quality of Service (QoS). The review also discusses the challenges associated with protocol selection, integration, and deployment in resource-constrained environments. Furthermore, emerging trends such as the convergence of edge computing, 5G connectivity, and enhanced security frameworks are examined for their impact on the evolution of M2M communication. The paper concludes by outlining future research directions, including the need for adaptive and intelligent protocol frameworks capable of addressing dynamic application requirements. By synthesizing recent advancements and providing actionable insights, this review aims to guide researchers, engineers, and practitioners in selecting and implementing optimal M2M communication protocols for next-generation IoT systems.Conclusion:
This paper presented a comprehensive review of the major M2M communication protocols, discussing their architecture, strengths, weaknesses, and application suitability. The selection of an appropriate protocol depends on specific application requirements, including scalability, security, and device capabilities. Future work will focus on overcoming current challenges and exploring emerging solutions for robust, intelligent, and scalable M2M communication.License:
Articles published in OAJEA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Cite This Paper:
Md. Hafizur Rahman, M.Naderuzzaman, “A Comprehensive Review of M2M Communication Protocols”, Open Access Journal on Engineering Applications (OAJEA), Volume No. 01, Issue No. 01, Page 1-13, July, 2025. https://oajea.hafizlab.com/article/01-01-001Reference:
[1] Gunjal, P.R., Jondhale, S.R., Lloret Mauri, J., & Agrawal, K. (2024). Internet of Things: Theory to Practice (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003282945
[2] Patil, S., Bhende, M., & Sharma, S. (2025). Optimising IoT Networks: Energy-Efficient Resource Management through Machine Learning (1st ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003606062
[3] Tolani, M., Balodi, A., Bajpai, A., Jain, V., & Kovintavewat, P. (Eds.). (2025). Security and Privacy Issues for IoT and WSN-based Real-time Applications (1st ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003491910
[4] Geng, Hwaiyu, ed. Internet of things and data analytics handbook. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
[5] Debruyne, C., Panetto, H., Weichhart, G., Bollen, P., Ciuciu, I., Vidal, M., & Meersman, R. (2009). On the move to meaningful Internet systems. In OTM 2017 Workshops-Confederated International Workshops, EI2N, FBM, ICSP, Meta4eS, OTMA 2017 and ODBASE Posters 2017, Rhodes, Greece, October 23-28, 2017, Revised Selected Papers (Vol. 10697).
[6] Nsoh, Bryan. "Development of Crop2Cloud: An IoT-integrated Platform for Automated Irrigation Scheduling Using Multi-source Stress Indices." (2024).
[7] Escamilla-Ambrosio, P. J., et al. "Distributing computing in the internet of things: cloud, fog and edge computing overview." NEO 2016: Results of the Numerical and Evolutionary Optimization Workshop NEO 2016 and the NEO Cities 2016 Workshop held on September 20-24, 2016 in Tlalnepantla, Mexico. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017.
[8] Pielli, Chiara, Daniel Zucchetto, Andrea Zanella, Lorenzo Vangelista, and Michele Zorzi. "Platforms and Protocols for the Internet of Things." EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things 1, no. 1 (2015): 1-15.
[9] Di Pasquale, A., Becker, J. K. M., Kettner, A. M., & Paolone, M. (2024). Ensuring solution uniqueness in fixed-point-based harmonic power flow analysis with converter-interfaced resources: Ex-post conditions. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.
[10] Qureshi, K.N., & Newe, T. (Eds.). (2024). Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT): New Standards, Technologies and Communication Systems (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003430018
[11] Feng, X., Yan, F. & Liu, X. Study of Wireless Communication Technologies on Internet of Things for Precision Agriculture. Wireless Pers Commun 108, 1785–1802 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06496-7
[12] Sinha, S. R., & Park, Y. (2017). Building Network Services. In Building an Effective IoT Ecosystem for Your Business (pp. 49-61). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[13] Mukhopadhyay, S.C., Suryadevara, N.K. (2014). Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities. In: Mukhopadhyay, S. (eds) Internet of Things. Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04223-7_1
[14] P. Di Marco, C. Fischione, G. Athanasiou and P. -V. Mekikis, "Harmonizing MAC and routing in low power and lossy networks," 2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Atlanta, GA, USA, 2013, pp. 231-236, https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2013.6831076.
[15] Sarkar, C., Das, A. & Jain, R.K. Development of CoAP protocol for communication in mobile robotic systems using IoT technique. Sci Rep 15, 9269 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76713-2
[16] Verma, P. K., Verma, R., Prakash, A., Agrawal, A., Naik, K., Tripathi, R., & Abogharaf, A. (2016). Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communications: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 66, 83-105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.02.016i
[17] Tightiz, L., & Yang, H. (2020). A Comprehensive Review on IoT Protocols’ Features in Smart Grid Communication. Energies, 13(11), 2762. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112762
[18] Alkwiefi, M. (2024, September). M2M Protocols: An Overview on LwM2M and XMPP Machine-to-Machine Protocols in IoT Context. In 2024 IEEE/ACIS 24th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS) (pp. 209-215). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIS61260.2024.10778343
[19] Shyam, P. R. (2025). A Survey of Communication Protocols in IoT: MQTT, COAP, and Beyond. https://philarchive.org/archive/RAGASO
[20] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., & Frystyk, H. (1996). Hypertext Transfer Protocol – HTTP/1.0 (RFC 1945). Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1945
[21] Rahman, M. H., Reza, M. M., Ferdous, R., Naderuzzaman, Kashem, M. A. (2025). Development of a IoT Based Thermologger for Real-Time Temperature Monitoring. Internet of Things and Cloud Computing, 13(2), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.iotcc.20251302.11
[22] Fette, I., & Melnikov, A. (2011). The WebSocket Protocol (RFC 6455). Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6455
[23] Saint-Andre, P. (2011). Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Core (RFC 6120). Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6120
[24] OASIS Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) Working Group. (2012). OASIS Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) Version 1.0. https://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/os/amqp-core-complete-v1.0-os.pdf
[25] Stanford-Clark, A., & Nipper, A. (2014). MQTT Version 3.1.1. OASIS Standard. https://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v3.1.1/os/mqtt-v3.1.1-os.html
[26] Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., & Bormann, C. (2014). The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) (RFC 7252). Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7252
[27] Object Management Group. (2015). Data Distribution Service (DDS) Specification (Version 1.4). https://www.omg.org/spec/DDS/1.4/
[28] Raza, U., Kulkarni, P., & Sooriyabandara, M. (2017). Low Power Wide Area Networks: An Overview. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(2), 855–873. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2652320
[29] Open Mobile Alliance. (2017). Lightweight Machine to Machine Technical Specification (OMA-TS-LightweightM2M-V1_0-20170208-A). https://www.openmobilealliance.org/release/LightweightM2M/V1_0-20170208-A/OMA-TS-LightweightM2M-V1_0-20170208-A.pdf
Journal Information
| Frequency: Quarterly |
| Submission to First Decision: 7 days |
| Submission to Acceptance: 30 days |
| Accept to Publish: 15 days |
| Article Processing Charges (APCs): None |
